Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strowd v. . Whitfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1932Published

1DissentStacy, C. J.

Civil action to recover deficiency judgment on notes given by highest bidder for lots at auction sale. The following memorandum was executed at the time of sale:

“This is to certify, that I have this day bought from E. L. Strowd through Chapel Hill Insurance and Eealty Company and Durham Auction Company, lots Nos. 16 to 23, inc., Block No. 18, of the E. L. Strowd farm, on the eastern corporate limits of Chapel Hill, N. 0., as shown on plat of said property made by Sidney Credle, surveyor, April, 1925, and also by Blair and Drane, engineers, 1 November, 1921, for which . agree to pay the sum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jobbers Overall Co. v. C. S. Hollister Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Thomas v. . Carteret CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. White v. Fisheries Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Summit Avenue Building Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Craig-Little Realty & Insurance v. SpurrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API