Legal Opinion

White v. Dallas County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 2, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Balias District Court. — Hon. J. H. Applegate, Judge. Action by the plaintiff j a commissioner of insanity of the defendant county, against it, for services as such commissioner. Trial to the court. Judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtKihne, J.

— The plaintiff, who was a duly appointed and acting commissioner of insanity of the defendant county for the year 1891, claims that in the discharge of said duties he was actually employed on seven separate days, in February, April, and May of said year, for which he claims compensation at the rate of three dollars for each of said days. He filed his claim as required by law. The defendant’s board of supervisors neglected to allow it, and he brought suit therefor. The defendant, answering, admits that the plaintiff is one of the commissioners of insanity for the defendant county, and that as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Neale v. UtzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  3. In re RichardsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1843
  4. Luske v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  5. Ferris v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Greb v. HurnWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Anson v. County of MontgomerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API