Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1939No. O-1604Published

1Opinion of the Court

c OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Hmiorable Riohard C. 8&ui oounty Attorney warhlngton county Branham, Texae /\‘\ mar set Attenblonr Julian h. V&h mquestinCf an opus1 material pOrtiOnB t 1.i Honor?bla Richard c, zpinn, Fego 2 -+ + ‘I would lppreoiata your oifloe fell- dorlng an opinion as to what amount would be proper an4 jurt ror Washington county to pay on the abovr mentioned oort bill as oomprnsatlon to the Commissioners .” Seotion 10 of Article 3284, Vernon’s Revised Civil Statutea, provides: When renlce of notloe has been perroot- sd, the oo&miesIonerr shall at the tlnn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolores No. 2 Land & Canal Co. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. White v. Dallas CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Johnson v. SutliffNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API