Legal Opinion
Sinay v. Lamson & Sessions Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 1, 1990No. 1:89CV1448PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Lynn Sinay and David Rosenberg, bring this suit against The Lamson & Sessions Company (“Lamson”), Russel B. Every, Gene F. Budd, and John B. Schulze (“the defendants”) pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78j(b). Sinay and Rosenberg also bring a state law claim based on negligent misrepresentation. The defendants have moved for dismissal of the complaint. For the reasons stated, the motion is granted.
I
The facts alleged are as follows. Sinay purchased 1,200 shares of Lamson common stock on March 6, 1989, at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lynn Sinay, David Rosenberg (90-4075) and Aline Halye (91-3051) v. The Lamson & Sessions Company Russell Every John Schulze and Gene BuddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Crowell v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Services, Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
- Albert Fadem Trust v. American Electric Power Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Greenberg v. Compuware Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- Blue Ocean Legacy Trust, et al. v. Andy Lefkowitz, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026