Legal Opinion

Consumers' Co. v. Hatch

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1912No. 184PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. The facts, which involve the construction of the charter of a'public service corporation in Idaho and its rights and obligations thereunder, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

Omitting reference to matters not pertinent to the alleged Federal questions relied upon, the facts.are these: Although it was optional with it to do so, the plaintiff in error, a water supply corporation, operating under a franchise granted in 1903, laid a water main in Third street, an ungraded street within the corporate limits of the then village — now city — of Cceur d’Alene, Idaho. While the company was supplying residents on the street with water for domestic use, upon payment of the regular monthly rates established by the Water Commission provided for by the statutes of Idaho, Albert…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Consumers Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Pocatello Water Co. v. StandleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Finucane v. Village of HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Reigle v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Nord v. Butte Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Title G. Etc. Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API