Legal Opinion

Workers' Credit Union v. Hannula

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The only question raised is whether the two individuals named trustees in this action at law begun *160by trustee process ought to be charged. They answered no funds. In answer to interrogatories put to them by the plaintiff it appears that the defendant Niemi assigned to them all his property, consisting of real estate subject to a mortgage, fixtures, stock in trade and an automobile; that he made an offer through these trustees to his unsecured creditors, which was accepted and has been paid; that the assignment has not been discharged, and that this defendant with the approval of the secured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krogman v. Rice Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Corsiglia v. BurnhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Cardany v. New England Furniture Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Sinclair v. Napoli Cafeteria, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Garratt-Ford Co. v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meunier's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. A. G. Walton & Co. v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Astuccio v. R.K. Ahern Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. French v. BallantyneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Astuccio v. R.K. Ahern Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API