Legal Opinion

French v. Ballantyne

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The only question in this case is whether the plaintiffs’ motion to charge Walter Ballantyne, Jr., “Executor of the Estate of Joseph Gschwendtner, as trustee of the principal defendants’ goods, effects and credits,” should have been allowed. The writ was served on the alleged trustee on March 5, 1937, and he answered under oath on March 17, 1937, that he had “No Funds.” In his answers under oath filed on April 14, 1937, to the plaintiffs’ interroga*388tories he stated, among other things, that he was not an executor of the estate of Joseph Gschwendtner, and that he had no goods, effects, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Worcester County National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Mechanics' Savings Bank v. WaiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Commonwealth v. McCreadyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  4. Brown v. Floersheim Mercantile Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Bostwick v. BassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New England Merchants National Bank v. HossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. Curnane v. CurnaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API