Kerlin v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Joseph Kerlin brings this interlocutory appeal from the denial of his motion to dismiss two indictments for Neglect of a Dependent 1, Class D felonies. We affirm.
ISSUES
We restate the issues on appeal as:
1. Whether the neglect of a dependent statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad as applied to Kerlin.
2. Whether the indictments are sufficient.
FACTS
Kerlin is a physician engaged in family practice. Kerlin also serves as the medical director for Cardinal Health Care ("Cardinal") in Danville. He serves as a medical consultant to Cardinal and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mallory v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cash v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Van Sant v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wine v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Marshall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- McIntosh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. SpringerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.