Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Morris

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1949No. Civ. 17192PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Appellant herein sought a writ of mandate to compel respondent Superintendent of the Department of Building and Safety of the City of Los Angeles to issue a building permit pursuant to an application therefor. Upon presentation of the petition to the superior court an alternative writ was denied, no hearing being had or evidence taken.

The allegations of the petition for a writ of mandate are that in December, 1948, plaintiff filed with the Department of Building and Safety plans and specifications and an application for a permit to build a dwelling house, and paid the fees required by law;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Gaylord v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Restivo v. Princeton Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Trottier v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API