Legal Opinion
Parsons v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 20, 2004No. CIV-F-5215OWWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WANGER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs claim unconstitutional execution of a search warrant and excessive force in holding an occupant in the course of executing the warrant. Defendants move for summary judgment. Doc. 85, Defendants’ Memo. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. Doc. 90, Plaintiffs’ Opposition.
I. Background
The Plaintiffs in this case are Norman Parsons and Mary Vincent. Mr. Parsons is the manager of Global Business Services. Ms. Vincent is the manager of two companies: Vincent & Associates and Ash-er Personnel. The Plaintiffs maintain the action…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Binay v. BettendorfCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Leonard v. Coolidge (In Re National Audit Defense Network)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007