Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Curhan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1955PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff, doing business under the name of Commercial Investigators, on July 23, 1951, brought a bill in equity complaining that the defendant Curhan, acting in control of the defendant Beacon Investigators, Inc., which was in competition with the plaintiff in the business of assisting business concerns to collect money due from delinquent debtors, has represented falsely to customers of the plaintiff that the plaintiff has discontinued his business and has been succeeded by Beacon Investigators, Inc. A master found that the misrepresentations complained of were made by servants of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stiles v. Municipal CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Malloy v. CarrollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Commissioner of Insurance v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Sears v. Inhabitants of NahantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Wheeler v. HansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Bournewood Hospital, Inc. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Chartrand v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Electronics Corporation of America v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973
  5. Jones v. BoykanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API