Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kendrick v. Powell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1947No. 8653Published

1ConcurrenceChief Justice Adair

(specially concurring).

I agree that the trial court properly disallowed the item of attorneys’ fees inserted .by defendants in their bill of costs. Section 9802, Revised Codes of 1935, enumerates and lists what a party to whom have been awarded costs, is entitled to include in his bill of costs. Attorneys’ fees are not among the items recognized or listed.

The suit is an ordinary civil action brought pursuant to the provisions of section 15 of Article III of the Constitution and of sections 1765 and 9955, Revised Codes.

In Hardware Mutual Cas. Co. v. Butler, 116 Mont. 73, 86, 148 Pac. (2d) 563,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sears v. Inhabitants of NahantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Smith v. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API