Legal Opinion

Miller v. Campbell County

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1995No. 94-200PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question presented in this appeal is novel to Wyoming, and it is substantially unique in American jurisprudence. Can the collateral source rule be invoked in favor of plaintiffs who are seeking compensation for inverse condemnation? The appellants in this case (homeowners) were ordered to evacuate their residences in a subdivision of Gillette known as Rawhide Village Subdivision. The reason for the evacuation was the presence of methane and hydrogen sulfide gases emerging from the coal deposits underlying the subdivision, to the extent that one could light a match and set…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. L.U. Sheep Co. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Western National Bank of Casper v. HarrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Campbell CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API