Sinclair Refining Co. v. Womack

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellee against appellant for rents and damages. Appellee alleged that he leased to appellant two filling stations, one called the “Sinclair Station,” and the other, the “Noodle Station.” The action was for rents on the Sinclair Station and for damages for an alleged failure on the part of appellant to perform certain ■contractual obligations with reference to the Noodle Station. Appellee was unable to sustain his allegations as to damages, and no issues were submitted to the jury on that portion of his cause of action, neither were such…