Legal Opinion

Charleston Station v. Stephens

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2015No. 63943Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Stephens sued Charleston Station for negligence. After a jury trial, Stephens and his wife were awarded $1,605,000. Charleston Station then unsuccessfully moved for a new trial, remittitur, or judgment as a matter of law, and the district court entered judgment in accordance with the jury's verdict. This appeal followed. Charleston Station is not entitled to a judgment as a matter of law or a new trial Charleston Station argues that it is entitled to either a judgment as a matter of law or a new trial based upon (1) our holding in Lee v. GNLV Corp., 117 Nev. 291,

22 P.3d 209

(2001), and (2) NRS…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. A. D. v. State of Calif. Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Nelson v. HeerNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Pope v. MOTEL 6Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Turner v. Mandalay Sports Entertainment, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API