Charleston Station v. Stephens
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stephens sued Charleston Station for negligence. After a jury trial, Stephens and his wife were awarded $1,605,000. Charleston Station then unsuccessfully moved for a new trial, remittitur, or judgment as a matter of law, and the district court entered judgment in accordance with the jury's verdict. This appeal followed. Charleston Station is not entitled to a judgment as a matter of law or a new trial Charleston Station argues that it is entitled to either a judgment as a matter of law or a new trial based upon (1) our holding in Lee v. GNLV Corp., 117 Nev. 291,
22 P.3d 209
(2001), and (2) NRS…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- A. D. v. State of Calif. Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Nelson v. HeerNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Pope v. MOTEL 6Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Turner v. Mandalay Sports Entertainment, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.