United States v. Alexander Joseph Mihaly
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Alexander Joseph Mihaly pled guilty to wire and mail fraud but appeals his sentence, claiming that the district court erred by ordering his sentence to run consecutively to previous sentences. The government concedes the district court erroneously held that it did not have discretion to impose a eoncur-rent sentence and requests a limited remand. We reverse and remand. 1
In 1993, Mr. Mihaly was indicted in the Central District of Illinois for wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and two counts of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341. He committed the offenses while serving an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Robert J. Shewmaker, Sr., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Johnnie Louis McAlpine AKA Louie McAlpineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Steve RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jesus Enrique Barrera-BarronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. CanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jeff McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Dallas Earl ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Kevin JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MayfieldDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997