Legal Opinion
Kroot Ex Rel. Kroot v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 25, 1992No. Civ. A. 89-2087 SSHPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This action concerns plaintiffs’ claim for reimbursement from the District of Columbia for the costs of special education for Joseph Kroot for the 1988-89 school year. Plaintiffs seek to recover those costs pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA or the Act), 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 1400-1485 (1988). 1 The matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies the parties’ motions and remands the case for the hearing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Roark Ex Rel. Roark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Middleton v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Schoenbach v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Lyons Ex Rel. Alexander v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Shaw v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.