Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Clark

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided March 18, 1974No. 55PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

The Panel has previously transferred several actions in the above-captioned litigation to the Western District of Oklahoma for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407.1 Since the Phillips action *976appeared to raise common factual issues, the Panel ordered the parties to show cause why it should not also be transferred to the Western District of Oklahoma. Only plaintiff opposes transfer. We find that this action raises questions of fact common to the previously transferred actions and that its transfer to the Western District of Oklahoma…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  2. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  3. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
  4. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
  5. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1974
  2. In re Holiday Magic Securities & Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
  3. In re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API