In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
Because of their similarity to other actions in the Four Seasons litigation, see, In re Four Seasons Securities Litigation, 328 F.Supp. 221 (Jud.Pan.Mult. Lit.1971), the two above-captioned actions were the subject of conditional transfer orders to the Western District of Oklahoma, entered by the Clerk of the Panel. Plaintiffs in both actions have moved to vacate these orders while the common defendant, Walston & Co., supports transfer. The parties have submitted the question on the briefs and we have concluded that both actions must be transferred for pretrial proceedings…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re Four Seasons Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
4Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation. Randolph Phillips v. Jack L. Clark and Anne ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.