Legal Opinion
United States v. Lenfesty
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1991No. Nos. 90-5132MN to 90-5135MN and 90-5169MNPublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
In these appeals five individuals, members of a methamphetamine distribution conspiracy, challenge their convictions and sentences. They allege constitutional and evidentiary errors at trial, as well as mistakes in the computation of their sentences. Because their contentions either lack merit, or (if well-founded) were incidental and harmless errors, we affirm.
I
In the fall of 1988 and the spring of 1989, Agent Paul Stevens of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension investigated a methamphetamine distribution ring centered in Rochester, Minnesota. His goal was to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- United States v. Gerald ConnellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Rusel J. Jagim, United States of America v. Jay L. Depew, United States of America v. Jay L. Depew, United States of America v. Sylvester A. Ziebarth, Sylvester A. Ziebarth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Harold S. Alston v. Walter Redman, Warden Charles M. Oberly, Iii, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Mark William Paul StauferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard Ray LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.