Legal Opinion
Ulrich v. Exxon Co., USA, a Div. of Exxon Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 4, 1993No. Civ. A. H-92-1119PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendants Exxon Company, U.S.A. (“Exxon”) and James Lawley’s (“Lawley”) motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # 13). Defendants seek summary judgment on Plaintiff Michael W. Ulrich’s (“Ulrich”) claims of employment discrimination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and tortious interference with beneficial relationship.
Jurisdiction in this matter is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. The parties consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Charles A. Iadimarco v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Azubuike v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Prescott v. Independent Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.