Legal Opinion
Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization v. Bauer
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 21, 1978No. Civ. A. C78-728PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
Invoking the Court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4), plaintiff Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization instituted the present action “on behalf of its members and all persons similarly situated.” By this action, equitable relief is sought for an alleged violation of the right of privacy as secured by the United States Constitution and Section 7 of the Privacy Act of 1974, Pub.L.No.93-579, 88 Stat. 1846, 1909 (codified at 5 U.S.C. § 552a note).
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The complaint in the instant action was filed upon the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Alcaraz v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Pontbriand v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Doyle v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Schmitt v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Doe v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.