Legal Opinion

Riverside St. Clair Corp. v. Walsh

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

Petitioner has obtained an order of certiorari to review a resolution of the board of standards and appeals, which granted an application for the erection of a garage for use by more than five vehicles. The property involved is partly in a residence district and partly in an unrestricted district, the total area of the unrestricted portion being seventy-seven and fifteen one-hundredths per cent of the entire area of the plot.

Section 7 of the Building Zone Resolution permits the board after public notice and hearing, and subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, to determine and vary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. People ex rel. Smith v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. People Ex Rel. Smith v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. People Ex Rel. Facey v. . LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. People ex rel. Swedish Hospital in Brooklyn v. LeoNew York Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kollock v. Sussex County Board of AdjustmentSuperior Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. Riverside St. Clair Corp. v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Reed v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Rutland Parkway, Inc. v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Mazzarell v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API