Legal Opinion
Gorodensky v. Mitsubishi Pulp Sales (MC), Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2000No. 96 Civ. 9758(MGC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
This is a breach of contract suit arising out of an alleged failure to satisfy the obligations of a letter of intent. Plaintiffs Hyman Gorodensky, H&H Warehousing Co. (“H&H”), and the estate of Harold Murawnik attempted, unsuccessfully, to establish a venture to build a manufacturing plant, operate the plant, and sell its output. Plaintiffs claim that defendant Mitsubishi Pulp Sales (MC) Inc. (“MPS”) entered into a binding contract with them by signing a letter of intent to purchase all of the output of the proposed plant. The complaint alleges that MPS…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Mary Ellen Winston v. Mediafare Entertainment Corporation, Gallavants, Inc., and Ralph SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Tribune Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fairbrook Leasing, Inc. v. Mesaba Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Nielsen Co. v. Success Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Ackerman v. Pilipiak (In Re Marine Risks, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Fairbrook Leasing, Inc. v. Mesaba Aviation, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Anthem, Inc. v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.