Legal Opinion

Gray v. Lawlor

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1907No. S.F. No. 3916PublishedCited by 34 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa 'Clara County and from an order denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment and to allow him to answer ¡to the merits of the action. M. H. Hyland, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment and from .•an order after judgment denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment and allow him to answer to the merits of the action.

The complaint states a good cause of action to quiet title to •a tract of land and the record shows due service of the summons by publication, and a judgment regularly entered. There is no merit in the appeal from the judgment, and it need not be further considered.

The affidavit of the defendant, in support of his motion to .be allowed to answer to the merits, stated that during the times mentioned in the complaint the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Albright v. WarkentinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lord v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Lyon v. RobbinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. McLean v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Pender v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Osmont v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Smith v. CollisMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Boland v. All Persons Etc.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. People v. One 1941 Chrysler SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API