Legal Opinion

Tash v. The Permanente Medical Group CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 2021No. C089143Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/8/21 Tash v. The Permanente Medical Group CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- KRYSTLE TASH, Plaintiff and Appellant, C089143 v. (Super. Ct. No. 34-2016- 00189518-CU-OE-GDS) THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Del Real v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. City of Lincoln v. BarringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API