Legal Opinion

Whippie v. O'Connor

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 16, 2010No. 2007-473PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Defendant appeals from a partition judgment in which the trial court awarded defendant the option of purchasing plaintiff’s share in certain real property, or in the alternative, if defendant did not exercise the option, ordered the property to be sold and proceeds divided according to a court-ordered percentage plan. Defendant claims on appeal: (1) that the court’s findings are not supported by the evidence; (2) that the court, in determining the equities, was swayed by irrelevant sympathy for plaintiff; and (3) that the court failed to consider available evidence that plaintiff was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Cabot v. CabotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. In re M.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. Quenneville v. ButtolphSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn and Natural Resources BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard StratthausSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Spooner v. Town of TopshamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. Whippie v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API