Legal Opinion
United States v. Albert James Goodheim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1981No. 80-1408PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
664 F.2d 754
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Albert James GOODHEIM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 80-1408.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 9, 1981.
ORDER
Before FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
1
The government petitions for rehearing, addressing the retroactivity issue which it failed to discuss in its responsive brief although it had been raised and argued in appellant's opening brief. The government does not contend that our decision, 651 F.2d 1294, is inconsistent with any prior Ninth Circuit decision, including United States v. Potts, 528 F.2d 883…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ehlert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Randall Wilford PricepaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Charles Michael PottsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. John Andrew JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Labor Relations Board v. East Wind EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981