Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Justin v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 24, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2007-2334Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RODNEY K. JUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 07-02334 (HHK) UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In a rambling prolix complaint, Rodney K. Justin, proceeding pro se, asserts various causes of action against the United States, the Department of the Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Justice, three identified individuals in their official capacity and five unidentified individuals.1 Justin charges that the United States unlawfully issued administrative summonses and unlawfully seeks to prosecute…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lindsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  4. Murphy v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  5. Holt v. DavidsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API