Legal Opinion

Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Pan American Airways, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 8, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Defendant Pan American’s motion challenges the court’s jurisdiction. The substantial ground of the motion is that a proper realignment of the parties reveals the absence of diversity of citizenship.

Upon the first argument of this motion, plaintiff, apprehending the risks involved in a jurisdictional doubt, agreed with the ■moving defendant to have the complaint amended in several respects, which will be hereinafter noted, and to drop the party whose citizenship was the same as that of the defendant Pan American. Upon that understanding defendant consented to a denial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Metcalf v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Komlos v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Komlos v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Nichols v. AlkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1954
  4. Creedon v. New HampshireDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1957
  5. Werkley v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N. V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API