Legal Opinion
Werkley v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N. V.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 4, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Defendant moves under Fed.Rules Civ. Proc. rule 15(a), 28 U.S.C.A., for permission to serve an amended answer, pleading an additional, separate and complete defense alleging that plaintiff is not the real party in interest in that the Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, the carrier of the deceased’s workman’s com*302pensation insurance, is now, by operation of Section 29, subd. 2, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of New York, McK. Consol.Laws, c. 67, the statutory assignee of the claim asserted in the complaint. Defendant also moves under Rule 56 for summary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Exchange Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Alexander v. CreelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Nelson v. Buffalo Niagara Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Werkley v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N. V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952