Gouled v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Felix Gouled was convicted of using the mails to defraud and of a conspiracy to defraud the United States, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, Circuit Judge.
This writ having come on for argument, we certified to the Supreme Court six questions suggested by the record. They have been specifically answered by the opinion of that court filed February 28, 1921 (255 U. S. —, 41 Sup. Ct. 261, 65 L.Ed. —), and the points suggested are also covered in the opinion in Amos v. United States (255 U. S. —, 41 Sup. Ct. 266, 65 L. Ed. —), filed the same day. The facts are so fully set forth in the higher court’s opinion that they need not be here repeated, and obviously the answers by the Supreme Court require reversal and a new trial.
Other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. GradwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. BathgateSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Bathgate Same v. Burckhauser Same v. Coons Same v. Farrell Same v. Klayer Same v. UrichoSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hamburg-American Steam Packet Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Isaac States, United States of America v. Michael McCoy United States of America v. Robert MorganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Foshay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- United States v. McKayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.