Legal Opinion
United States v. Bathgate
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 4, 1918No. 575-580PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
246 U.S. 220 (1918)
UNITED STATES
v.
BATHGATE ET AL.
UNITED STATES
v.
BURCKHAUSER ET AL.
UNITED STATES
v.
COONS ET AL.
UNITED STATES
v.
FARRELL ET AL.
UNITED STATES
v.
KLAYER ET AL.
UNITED STATES
v.
URICHO ET AL.
Nos. 575-580.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 16, 17, 1918.
Decided March 4, 1918.
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Fitts for the United States.
Mr. John R. Holmes and Mr. Sherman T. McPherson, with whom Mr. Froome Morris and Mr. M. Muller were on the brief, for defendants in error.
2Opinion of the Court · McREYNOLDSJustice McREYNOLDS
Except as to parties, the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. GradwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by51 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Darrell Chip Wadena, United States of America v. Jerry Joseph Rawley, Jr., United States of America v. Rick ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.