United States v. Gradwell
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND, ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. The cases are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke
These four cases were argued together because the indictments in the first three must be justified, if at all, under the same section (§ 37) of the Criminal Code of the United States-, while the fourth involves the application of § 19 of that Code to the same state-of facts which we have in the third case.
In the Gradwell case (No. 683) and in the Hambly case .(No. 684) the fourteen defendants are charged in .the in? dictments with having conspired together “to defraud the United States,” and to commit a wilful fraud upon the laws of the State of Rhode Island, by corrupting and debauching, by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.