Legal Opinion
Nathanson v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 10, 1952No. 33Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
344 U.S. 25 (1952)
NATHANSON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
No. 33.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 23, 1952.
Decided November 10, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
Joseph Kruger argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Alan J. Dimond and Henry Friedman.
Mozart G. Ratner argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Owsley Vose and Irving M. Herman.
2Opinion of the Court · DouglasJustice Douglas
Respondent, the National Labor Relations Board, issued a complaint…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gardner v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.