Legal Opinion

Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Davidson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1991No. 21147, 21446PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal involves a challenge by a non-settling defendant to the district court’s approval of a settlement between a co-defendant and the plaintiff. Appellant, Velsicol Corporation (Velsicol), claims that the district court failed to consider certain factors in finding that the settlement was made in good faith. [Headnote 1]

NRS 17.245 requires a settlement to be a “good faith” settlement, but gives little guidance in applying this standard. This court has never discussed the meaning of “good faith” as it is used in NRS 17.245. Velsicol argues for an interpretation consistent with…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re MGM Grand Hotel Fire LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. The Doctors Co. v. VincentNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Troyer v. AdamsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Duk v. MGM Grand Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Otak Nevada, Llc v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API