Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Petition for Naturalization of Brenda Barbara Weitzman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1970No. 19446_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The three of us who heard this appeal have, it turns out, separate and distinct approaches. Two (Judges Blackmun and Heaney) conclude that the constitutional issue is to be reached. One (Judge Lay) concludes that it need not be reached. The two who reach the constitutional issue find themselves apart in the resolution of that issue. Accordingly, Judges Lay and Heaney, for differing reasons, vote to reverse the district court’s denial of the applicant’s petition for naturalization and Judge Blackmun votes to affirm that denial. The trial court is thus reversed by a divided vote. Our separate…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hunt v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Rowland v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. Kane v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  4. United States v. Karl Erick BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. In Re MurthaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API