Legal Opinion

In re McNeely

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 14, 2012No. 2012-B-1324PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*276ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

| j This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.1

FORMAL CHARGES

Count I — The Lee Matter

In June 2009, Delores Perkins Lee retained respondent to handle a succession matter, paying him a total of $1,900. Respondent did not complete the succession, despite his assurances that he would do so, and failed to communicate with Ms. Lee.

In June 2010, Ms. Lee filed a complaint against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  3. In re BoudreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. In re PowersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  5. In re SzubaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. In re McNeelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API