Smusch v. Kohn
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Fifth District Oourt.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The action is in trover to recover for the conversion of one bevel glass cabinet partition, two brass chandeliers ¿and a showcase. The facts are substantially as follows:
The premises ¡No. 1048 Second avenue, in which the property ■was contained, belong to .the defendant. George F. Bolz was a Tenant of the premises, and carried on the oyster business there from 1889 till 1892. He had the articles made and put in the 'premises for his own benefit and purposes and on his own account, "without reference to the' interests of the freehold. The glass cabinet, as the plaintiff describes it, was an -…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Navigation & Pier Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Loughran v. . RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- McKeage v. . Hanover Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Watriss v. First National Bank of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nine Hundred Main, Inc. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Bernheimer v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Vissenberg v. BresnahenWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
- Levin v. Improved Property Holding Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Royce v. LatshawColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.