Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1985No. CX-85-557PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

The State appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The State claims the trial court erred in concluding (1) the search warrant was an invalid general warrant, (2) the search was not conducted incident to a lawful arrest, and (3) the evidence was not admissible under a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule. We affirm.

FACTS

On December 21, 1984, the St. Paul police obtained a search warrant authorizing a search of the Esquire Bar in St. Paul. The warrant authorized the police to search the “premises of 823 University…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. HinkelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. HeidelbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Sutton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API