State v. Robinson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
The State appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The State claims the trial court erred in concluding (1) the search warrant was an invalid general warrant, (2) the search was not conducted incident to a lawful arrest, and (3) the evidence was not admissible under a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule. We affirm.
FACTS
On December 21, 1984, the St. Paul police obtained a search warrant authorizing a search of the Esquire Bar in St. Paul. The warrant authorized the police to search the “premises of 823 University…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. HinkelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Commonwealth v. HeidelbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.