Legal Opinion

State v. Hinkel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1985No. CX-83-2059PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This case comes to this court on a petition for further review of the Court of Appeals’ decision overturning the defendant’s conviction for possession of controlled substances. 353 N.W.2d 617. At the omnibus hearing on August 16, 1983, the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of his person was denied. His right to a jury trial was waived and, on stipulated facts, the defendant was convicted. On appeal, the defendant’s conviction was reversed on the ground that the search of his person was pursuant to an illegal search warrant and was overly intrusive to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. De SimoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. State v. HinkelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. HeidelbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. State v. WynneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. PriorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API