Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 22, 1989No. 01-89-00192-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARREN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of engaging in organized criminal activity.

After the trial court overruled his motions to quash the indictment and to require the State to identify an alleged informer, appellant pled nolo contendere to the indictment. The court found appellant guilty, accepted the plea bargain made by the parties, and assessed punishment at 20 years confinement.

In two points of error, appellant claims that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment and his motion to identify an informer. The indictment, in pertinent part, reads…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DeVaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Farrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. United States v. Richard Lee WillisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Ex Parte HunterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Bollman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bodin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Delay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Brokenberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Delay, Thomas DaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API