Legal Opinion

Martin v. Fulton Iron Works Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1982No. 44261, 44364PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant seeks recovery for the wrongful death of her husband, John Martin, who was electrocuted while painting the building of defendant-respondent Fulton Iron Works Company. Fulton Iron Works brought a third party indemnity action against Martin’s employer, Hartmann-Walsh Painting Co. The jury found Fulton Iron Works negligent and awarded plaintiff damages of $500,000 but with full indemnity against Hartmann-Walsh. The trial court found Martin contributorily negligent as a matter of law and entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Fulton Iron…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonnell Aircraft Corp. v. Hartman-Hanks-Walsh Painting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State ex rel. Maryland Heights Concrete Contractors, Inc. v. FerrissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Parks v. Union Carbide Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. Hannah v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Dorn v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Akers v. Warson Garden ApartmentsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Eubank Ex Rel. Eubank v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Holman v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Coello v. Tug Manufacturing Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API