Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Wooley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1950No. 18,037PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWlLTROUT, J.

Appellee brought this action to recover damages for injuries resulting from a fall in appellant’s store while she was a customer therein. It is alleged that appellant negligently caused its floor to become slippery and dangerous by improperly applying a floor dressing in too great quantities and in failing .to remove excess dressing. or place another substance on the .floor. Trial by jury resulted in a $2500 verdict for appellee.

Appellant assigns as error the overruling of its motion for new trial, the grounds set forth being: (1) rulings concerning improper statements made by appellee’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hulett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rudolph v. LandwerlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Robertson Bros. Dept. Store v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. J. C. Penney, Inc. v. KellermeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Riechmann v. ReasnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ruth Hetzel v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Bell v. Walmart Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  5. New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API