Legal Opinion

Riechmann v. Reasner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1943No. 27,927PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by reason of the collision of an automobile owned and operated by the appellee with an automobile operated by the appellant. The collision occurred at a street intersection in the City of Evansville, Indiana.

The only assigned error is the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

In the voir dire examination of the jury the appellee’s attorney asked each of them whether or not he had any interest in or connection with the Gulf Insurance Company. Objection to this question…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mishler v. Chicago, South Bend & Northern Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Coca Cola Bottling Works of Evansville, Inc. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Thomas Madden, Son & Co. v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. v. StormentIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Marmon Motor Car Co. v. SchaferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Huey v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. RUST v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Koeneman v. AldridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Siebeking v. Ford, Admx., Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1958

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API