Legal Opinion

Cinquan Cartledge v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2014No. 13-CM-325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant Cinquan Cartledge was found guilty after a bench trial of one count of unlawful entry. On appeal, he attacks the legitimacy of the “Bar Notice” issued to him on September 23, 2012, which he was alleged to have violated on December 4, 2012. He contends that the Bar Notice was invalid because it rested solely on the police officers’ mere suspicion of his involvement in criminal activity, as opposed to a higher standard of proof. In the alternative, appellant argues that his actions on September 23 warranted no more than a sixty-day bar that would have…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Roy L. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Adam Jaramillo Ortberg v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Coates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darius Briscoe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Darius Winston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Darius Briscoe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Foster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API