North Township Advisory Board v. Mamala
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIVAN, Chief Justice.
This appeal is before this Court pursuant to Ind.R.App.P. 4(A)(8). Judge Pinkerton entered judgment and a final order which provided in part:
"1. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 1.0. 36-10-7-5 is declared invalid and unconstitutional in that it violates the proscriptions contained in § 22(10) and § 23 of Article 4 of the Constitution of Indiana."
*726The trial court issued a permanent restraining order enjoining the Advisory Board from exercising power or undertaking any action pursuant to the statute.
Ind.Code § 86-10-7-5 outlines the procedures for the acquisition of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dortch v. LugarIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Ruge v. KovachIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Heckler v. ConterIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- BOARD OF COM'RS OF COUNTY OF ALLEN v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Municipal City of South Bend v. KimseyIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HoovlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Hammond v. Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc. and State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- In Re Train Collision at Gray, Ind.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Dillon v. Chicago South Shore & North Bend Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.