Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1939No. 34,248PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*188The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

The question here presented is the measure of damages to be applied when a lienholder appeals from an award in condemnation proceedings under G. S. 1935, ch. 26, art. 1, as amended by Laws 1937, ch. 226, § 1 (G. S. 1937 Supp. 26-102). Two appeals were taken to this court by the state highway commission from awards made in the district court. For our purposes the facts in each are alike and will be stated in the singular.

On March 7, 1938, the state highway commission initiated the proceedings by filing its petition to have .certain lands…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Lawrence & Denver Railroad v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. SheldonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Rand v. Fort Scott, Wichita & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Williams v. Hutchinson & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Schermerhorn v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hoy v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Moore v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Moore v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Kansas Homes Development Co. v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API