Legal Opinion

American Guaranty Co. v. Caldwell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 11, 1934No. 7356PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

The American Guaranty Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Ohio, appellant herein, employed Hartley Caldwell, appellee herein, and a resident of Long Beach, Cal., to act as its general agent in certain counties in Southern California under a contract dated March 5, 1928. Said contract, among other things, provided: “Should any misunderstanding arise as to the interpretation of any part of this contract or any dispute ensue as to its application in the settlement to be made hereunder, it is agreed that at the request of either party hereto the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re WoernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. B. Priestley & Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Karsner v. LothianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & BainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Catz American Co. v. Pearl Grange Fruit Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. Holodnak v. AVCO CORP., AVCO-LYCOMING D., STRATFORD, CONN.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API