Legal Opinion

State v. Potter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 2011No. 080331177, 080431933 A142227 (Control), A142243PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

In these cases, which were consolidated for trial and appeal, defendant was convicted of numerous counts of identity theft. ORS 165.800. In Case Number 080331177 (“the APF case”), defendant was found guilty of one count of identity theft; in Case Number 080431933 (“the BTS case”), defendant was found guilty of six counts of identity theft. On appeal, he argues that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of certain statements he made because they were the result of police interrogation conducted in violation of his right to counsel under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. DerricoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. SparklinOregon Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Prieto-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Orchard v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. DulfuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API